mcant

Who the hells distressed lol I just find it embarressing anyone so ecerly top macho or camp is trying to fool someone maybe?

In theory yes in practice probably no

I'm not sure which world some of the posters here live in but I. along with my friends. straight and gay. live in the real world where our most pressing problems are mortgage repayments wages penion fund etc... sadly as you grow older politically correct posturing takes a back seat to fiscal reality and back on topic I cant remember Sulu jumping anything male or female so the entire original post is invalid BTW I also hate the taste of pineapple what does that mean I am repressing?

not Conformity, just normality without affectation I prefer people to be themselves without any "look at me I'm so macho I eat bricks for breakfast" or "look at me Im the queen of the may" bullshit most of which behaviour is nothing but affectation Please dont say that being openly gay involves doing an imitation of a teapot because outside television and the occassional drunked wind up most gays whom I know do not behave like that. In fact many find annoying

Rofl the old insinuation neither do I want to attend a public execution or an an autopsy. does this make me a necrophile with sadistic tendencies? BTW I'm always a bit suspicious of over the top blokey behaviour

Well she lived in Walker which is more mavericks side of the water B) so see him thats a regional joke btw we live on opposite sides of the same river but all the slappers come form his side :p

I cant remember who first said it. but I love the quote that say's "there are no agnostics in foxholes" I thin maybe votes is a bit of a cop out

you meet this drop dead gorgeous WOMAN in a bar. you demand to see her birth certiificate do you? BTW this doesnt mean I condone sex with children just that sometimes it can be hard to tell

true anecdote .. about 20 years ago when we were all young and daft my friend had this absolutely gorgeous girlfriend with a figure most women would ill for.. she had one disadvantage as a girlfriend. she was a complete oversexed slut. anyone anywhere. anytime... to cut a long story short it turned out she was 12.... yes TWELVE!!!! I would have sworn blind she was 19. at the time I was 26 so I'm very reticent in throwing the first stone in paedophilia cases

well the MPAA is still there

bumped because people are respecting the no posting idea

I'm sure america has cell blocs full of guys saying that. in England they only have to be ovr 16 but sometimes even thats hard to judge

we need definitions

What is openly gay? I mean what the hell is openly heterosexual? I just act naturaly I'm not proclaiming anything and most homosexual people I know live the same way If you mean acting as camp as a row of tents that is not the behaviour of most gay people I know Why should gay people be open about their sexuality. I dont walk into a bar and tell everyone that I sleep with women?

Quark corrupt but efficient plus once you got the dirt on him he'ld accept it and you'ld be set for life

Ok this is not a discussion thread. no posts no arguements/justifications or flames just a straightforward yes no or I am a fence sitter (scared of offending the big yin if he does exist) I'm just curious to see how this goes

Years ago as a joke I said all chikdren should be reversibly sterilized shortly before puberty. This should only be reversed after they had undergone courses in childcare child psychology etc and passed an exam now I'm starting to think it might not be a bad idea (if nothing else it will massively reduce the worlds population within two generations)

dont be disgusting a human male and a female sheep is perfectly natural a shepherd and a ram is just totally unnatural! What kind of pervert do you think shepherds are??? (BTW if you are starting to suspect Im not taking this too seriously you might be right)

you've obviously never been to Northumberland you are now discriminating against a hell of a lot of hill farmers with big wellies! seriously though you see my point I hope. where do you stop? and actually marrying a sheep really wouldn't hurt anyone so why ban it?

But isn't that exactly what it is? a sterile shadow? Marriage is family. children etc its not just mortgage rebates and a tax break As for longevity of relationships you'll get no arguement from me I'm divorced like most of my cousins. my uncle on the other hand has been with the same guy for over 40 years! though they aren't married they own their home in common and have mutually beneficial wills and have sorted everything out through legal channels already There are ways around most tax regulations

Kind of appropriate :p BTW you all lose 1 point for checking this post OK you swines now Im scared to open my emails lol payback is coming :p and nuages damn nice trick getting the time out before you opened your PMs I spent 10 minutes trying to find a way to avoid opening your message untill I realised I'ld lost just by trying to find a way out :cyclops:

So if the majority of people voted that black people should be segregated from whites that is ok then? Sorry but I disagree. To be treated equally is a right that everyone has. It isnt something that can be voted on. So you are anti democracy then or is it only if you think the majority will disagree with you Dont get me wrong I have nothing against any couple having equal legal and financial protection its just the idea of calling it marriage that kind of grates This is an extreme example I know and I know i'm gonna get flamed for this.. but... what about equal rights for beastiophiles what is so wrong with people having sex with animals. and if someone wanted to enter a life long partnership with a sheep shouldn't he be allowed to? why should he be discriminated against? And what about the guy married to a 14 year old surely the other states are discriminating against any other man who wants sex with 14 year old girls. the precendent exists in some states so equal rights for all paedophiles. why should they be discriminated against just because they live in the wrong state And whats so terrible about necrophilia? and dueling? if two people want to fight to the death why shouldn't they be allowed to? why should their right to kill each other if they are both in agreement be legislated against

I lost too but I sent Nuages a PM so he loses the minute he sees it I think everyone else should pm him make the titles innocuas and then just Write THE GAME in ten we'll start spamming his emails B) well Its his own fault for starting this lol

Any military force that has a stun setting on their weapons is gonna lose. Totally wrong mindset for galactic domination The Federation will still be prepping a diplomatic party while their planet blows up Anyway if tribbles develop space travel they''ll own both of them :p