Engineer101 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 UK Won't Join US in Attacking Iran British newspapers are reporting that Foreign Secretary Jack Straw has created a 200-page dossier which states that the best course of action against Iran's nuclear program is diplomacy led by Britain, France and Germany. Reports state Straw will meet with US secretary of state nominee Condoleezza Rice in February and argue his case. Reports that the US intends to attack Iran increased when a "New Yorker" story reported that US commandos have been operating in Iran. The Pentagon said that story was "riddled with fundamental errors" but it didn't deny conducting such missions. VP Cheny said Iran is "right at the top of the list" when it comes to international issues. yeah, after IRAN, NEXT North Korea, then Cuba, then our arab allies. the US, our country is going on a rampage for war. Nations are form through conquering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 I don't blame the british for not joining. What are the Iranians accused of? Not being democratic or religious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtremeskiing Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Iran got cancelled....were going after britain for not supporting Bush's foreign policy. Just kidding, but if i wasn't would you be surprised? Brannon should cast bush a special guest apperance as a Borg. Resistence is Futile...you will be americanized!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamp Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 i'm pretty sure that we (UK) wont go to war with iran unless they really step up there nuclear program and become a very real threat, but they are hardly there yet. Iran is taking the mick, with the treatys it's made with Britain, France and Germany. the best route is sanctions if they continue to try and get around them. There army is not like saddams or the talabans, a war would be very bloody. it's far to early to consider attacking. yeah' date=' after IRAN, NEXT North Korea, then Cuba, then our arab allies. the US, our country is going on a rampage for war. Nations are form through conquering. [/quote'] not sure if your being sarcastic or not. are you for or against attacking iran? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted January 23, 2005 Author Share Posted January 23, 2005 Im against the war. (in the future, America Declares war on the world cause they have nukes and stuff) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psheldrake1 Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 I'm still waiting for the US to annex my poor Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quosego Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Just wondering..... where will it end.... Afghanistan Irak, only things they have done is not being western country's and not supporting bush and oh i forgot.... they are a threat to the US..... i can really only think of one threat to the US, and i believe it is leading that country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Iran & North Korea are both run by fanatics....... One is a fanatic atheist, the other is a fanatic Muslim. BOTH are stupid enough to press the button. So, the question becomes: Do we wait until AFTER they press the button, or do we stop them now, before they can make enough weapons to destroy the Earth itself? :stare: .......And people actually wonder why I want to live on Mars?? Sheesh! :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quosego Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Yes we do wait after they press the button, because if there is one thing you can't rely on it is the american information gathering intelligencies.......... sure irac is full of nukes and biochemical weapons..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted January 23, 2005 Author Share Posted January 23, 2005 North Korea is missing alot of things for the nuke and might have to trade some stuff for the missing parts. so north Korea isnt a threat now. all they want is food and supplies and they shut down their production for now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Yes we do wait after they press the button' date=' because if there is one thing you can't rely on it is the american information gathering intelligencies.......... sure irac is full of nukes and biochemical weapons.....[/quote'] Iran doesn't deny having the weapons & neither does North Korea. Oh, and if they press the button, we're all dead. ......Alle toten. :stare: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted January 23, 2005 Author Share Posted January 23, 2005 the US has the best missile defense system, or used to...since the Ruskies got a new Toy (missile) to play with...and plus any chance of NK nuking us will be responded with Forces from SK and US garrisons supply by bombers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quosego Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Iran doesn't deny having the weapons & neither does North Korea. didn't say that.... ;) they probably do have nukes and stuff but i don't think they will use them. i think it is more likely they will press the button if attacked...... and so will a few other country's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 We were GOING to have the best missle defense system.......It was called Star Wars, and was shot down by the Democrats back in Ronald Regan's term of office. Currently, we don't have jack....... :stare: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 they probably do have nukes and stuff but i don't think they will use them. LOL.......What do all Muslims have in common? They hate the nation of Israel. What do all Muslims want? Jerusalem. Who is the ally of Israel? The USA. Muslim Nations want nukes so they can attack Israel with them. Of course, if they attack Israel, we'll have to help, since we are allies. ......Pretty soon, you have WW3 with nukes flying everywhere. :stare: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quosego Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 LOL.......What do all Muslims have in common? They hate the nation of Israel. What do all Muslims want? Jerusalem. Who is the ally of Israel? The USA. maybe they have a reason for hating israel.... and i believe the same goes for the usa..... and i sincerely doubt attacking iran is going to solve that problem. any muslim who wasn't pissed at america, will be after that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Engineer101 Posted January 23, 2005 Author Share Posted January 23, 2005 some moron keeps telling the US has the best Air Force in the World. That is half true (more like 2nd best now). Israel has the best Air Force in the world because they were trained by Americans. Best Fighter Jet Piloting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamp Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 Iran & North Korea are both run by fanatics....... One is a fanatic atheist, the other is a fanatic Muslim. you forgot to mention america is run by a fanatic christian Even at the hight of the cold war neither the soviets or U.S had the capability to win outright on a first strike. NK would not have a chance, they wouldn't launch a nuclear strike, it would screw them from the word go. the real threat is a country like iran supplying terrorist with wmd, but something tells me israel wont allow iran to gain nuclear capabilities Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 you forgot to mention america is run by a fanatic christian Fanatic christians didn't bomb the USS Cole. Famatic christians didn't bomb embassies in Tanzania and Zaire. Fanatic christians didn't fly four planes into buildings filled with innocent civilians on September 11th. Fanatic christians don't behead people just because they aren't of the 'right' religion. Your rhetoric is unsubstantiated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waelabdo Posted January 23, 2005 Share Posted January 23, 2005 you forgot to mention america is run by a fanatic christian Fanatic christians didn't bomb the USS Cole. Famatic christians didn't bomb embassies in Tanzania and Zaire. Fanatic christians didn't fly four planes into buildings filled with innocent civilians on September 11th. Fanatic christians don't behead people just because they aren't of the 'right' religion. Your rhetoric is unsubstantiated. Fanatic christians did bomb houses at iraq of normal people that has nothing to do with saddam or making any problem to us,Fanatic christians did bomb a mosque that normal people use it as a shultter (not as weapon storage area, as it could be said), so imagine u destroy a church that people thinks that may have peace there, and then u say there were a possibility that were weapons hided there, Fanatic christians did attack a small village with heavy heavy armory and jets and missles cause they refused his occupation for them lands, then u say US sets people free at Iraq? or killing them? ,saddam was a problem , US is greater one, occupying a land for petroleum (no more), just as greedy as any tyrant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts