Relentless Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 The time difference inbetween TNG and voyager well episode wise they are set in roughly the same timeline sort of because Picard talks to admiral Janeway sometime in TNG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamp Posted February 23, 2005 Share Posted February 23, 2005 voyager is set just after tng and during ds9 before the doinion war, i dont remember picard talking to janeway in TNG, they talked in the latest movie but thats set after ds9 and voy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtremeskiing Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 I read what I read, and that is what I read. If certain people consider me a moron for saying what I read, then so be it. However, I have trouble taking anyone with a pot leaf for an avatar seriously. Not that pot is bad, my friends call me "Billy Burnout" and billy isn't even my name. I just think it is classless to advertise it. (little bit of retribution). I wish I got to read the deleted post, im sure I would have a lot to comment on that. -Drew Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaper Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 Actually on my deleted post i retracted my accusation of you being a moron skiiing. You are just iggnorant. And would you consider it classless to advertise Xbox or Intel, other recreations of mine? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtremeskiing Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 no actually, I wouldnt find it classless. But if you really did apologize in that deleted post, then I do too. Just had to defend myself, you know how it is. But as for the tree man, [now in a friendly tone], c'mon it is classless, thats your personal life, its not something you want to advertise like that. You don't know who will use that against you one day, until they legalize it, keep it to your self. Trust me, I learned my lesson the hard way, I have a reputation for being "Billy Burnout" and now that i've grown up and rather keep what I do in my house (car, fraternity house, bar bathrooms, concerts etc.) to myself...well it kinda sucks, I go to a bar, and chicks say "so your billy....." and they expect something that is not me, they expect what they have heard. Keep the avatar if you want that, its your call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maverick Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 * Deleted for violation of posting rules * what did he say? im curious ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Relentless Posted February 24, 2005 Share Posted February 24, 2005 * Deleted for violation of posting rules * what did he say? im curious ;) Probably better not to know. I wouldn't be, curios that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vystral Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 no no no no no....in response to the transwarp question. Intrepid class ships were NOT built with transwarp in mind. The Federation obviously did not plan on Voyager getting hurled across the galaxy. And yes, they would have used transwarp to get home faster, but as they said in Dark Fronteir: "We would use transwarp, but we can't replicate coils. If we could get our hands on just one transwarp coil, we could shave 20 years off our trip." That was the whole idea behind boarding the Borg sphere.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werecow Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 a long long time ago, i read that it had something to manuveribility and efficiency. went alot like what the renegade said, pretty sure he is correct As for the Warp 5 speed limit. TNG epsode, while traveling through an area of space, they were contacted by something (cant rememberif its energy, or traditional life) pleading that their area of space was being destroyed by the frequent warp vessels coming through. The crew determined that the area was a weak spot, as there was more. Against the recommendation of picard, star fleet set a speed limit of warp 5. Picard said 2. this is the correct answer as it is explained in the voyager technical manual i saw the TNG ep you are refering to today on spike and yes they were restricted to warp 5 to keep from tearing up the corridor they were traveling through. the title of the ep was "Force of nature"....thank you moo roar moo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSWIceman Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 I don't know why they are down in the first place, but heres an explination of why they have to be up. http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/design.htm (Cool site btw) Gene Roddenbury's Design Rules Rule #3 Both warp nacelles must be fully visible from the front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vystral Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Sounds good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Does anyone know what the time difference is between TNG and Voyager? A backwater TV Channel called "UPN"? :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
werecow Posted March 3, 2005 Share Posted March 3, 2005 Does anyone know what the time difference is between TNG and Voyager? A backwater TV Channel called "UPN"? :p hee hee good one!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vystral Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 Yeah, TNG was cooler. More tactical, maybe too. Voyager I think was supposed to be "edgy." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hubix Posted March 4, 2005 Share Posted March 4, 2005 I realized Robert Mcneil who played Nick Lakarno in TNG 05x19 "The First Duty" was turned into Tom Paris in Voyager. Does anyone know what the time difference is between TNG and Voyager? The first episode of TNG was on stardate 41153.7 (TNG 1x01 - Encounter at Fapoint) The last was on stardate 47988.1 (TNG 7x25-26 - All Good Things...) Mentioned episode TNG 5x19 - "The First Duty" was on stardate 45703.9. Voyager starts at stardate 48315.6 (VOY 1x01-02 - Caretaker) and ends on 54973.4 (7x25-26 - Endgame). So Voyager started right after TNG was over. For what we see on the show, one year is about (or exactly) 1000 units in stardate. So it is easy to count the differential. Also note that TNG crew is still active while Voyager got already back home. By the way, if 1 year is 1000 units in stardate (you can see that by looking at stardates in TNG, DS9 and VOY - 1 year of the show is one year of time that passes in the story, and that is 1000 units of stardate [how call it?]) then that's wrong somehow, because TNG started on about 41000 and TOS finished on 6000 and between them should be 70-year gap. We have 70 years and 35000 units of stardate between them, so it shoulb be 2 years per 1000 units of stardate, and now it is different. Can anyone explain it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DSWIceman Posted March 5, 2005 Share Posted March 5, 2005 Can anyone explain it? No. The stardate system has no explination. :rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now