Jump to content

Trek Canon Link


gjnave
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a very informative page regarding Star Trek Canon. It's very well researched.

Here's an interesting statement from it:

 

According to Paula Block of Viacom Consumer Products:

 

"Another thing that makes canon a little confusing. Gene R. himself had a habit of decanonizing things. He didn't like the way the animated series turned out, so he proclaimed that it was NOT CANON. He also didn't like a lot of the movies. So he didn't much consider them canon either. And--okay, I'm really going to scare you with this one--after he got TNG going, he...well...he sort of decided that some of the Original Series wasn't canon either. I had a discussion with him once, where I cited a couple things that were very clearly canon in the Original Series, and he told me he didn't think that way anymore, and that he now thought of TNG as canon wherever there was conflict between the two. He admitted it was revisionist thinking, but so be it."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember many conflicts between TOS and TNG besides the special effects stuff. IMHO, this sort of problem came to light with Voyager and, particularly, Enterprise.

 

Roddenberry's supposed statement sounds a little confusing, though. Canon, or not canon: that is the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its not Canon it means, it isn't part of the rest and official Star Trek storyline? But how can that be, i mean, a lot of stuff of TOS can be found in other series... In DS9, it even takes (1 episode) place in TOS timeline, and ENT has mirror episode, with all em stuff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from reading some other stuff i think that it is mostly talking about season 3 of TOS ... because some of the episodes were .. well... ludicrous :D (Spocks Brain for example) :D

 

edit: Oh yeah.. there was also some episode with Spock hanging out with some inter-galactic hippies.. thats pretty bad too! :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retcon, eh?

 

I can understand the reasoning behind that.

 

TOS and TNG were very different animals in their implementation, if not their ideals and there were a lot of stupid episodes of TOS. I imagine Roddenbury was like many creative types and looked back at his previous work and thought "what a load of pish".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...