StevenofNine Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 screw those 29th century time travelers anyway.... I just wanna a great bj.... GeneralLee, my hero. ;) How about a great bj in the 29th Century. Those Borg should have some interesting attachments. Can't imagine why this thread hasn't been closed, what with all the chatter about things being put into other things. :o Come on, Tolver, Gay Bshing, here? If you're a 37-year old Gay Man you've seen a lot worse than anything that's been posted here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralLee Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 LMAO.... I'm surprised Boris hasn't said anything, since he posted what he did. Maybe he and the other ARE the same... hmmm... I'll have to mull that one over for a while.... don't get me started on that crap again... ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piepie Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 Why aren't there any jolly, fat, mustacheod porn stars in Trek? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolver Posted May 10, 2005 Author Share Posted May 10, 2005 Why aren't there any jolly' date=' fat, mustacheod porn stars in Trek?[/quote'] Well, there WAS Harcord Finton Modd, he fit that profile. I suppose that in todays world you would need to get Ron Jerremy to play Harry Mudd if you were making a porno spoof of Star Trek. Tolver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenofNine Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 Why aren't there any jolly' date=' fat, mustacheod porn stars in Trek?[/quote'] Well, there WAS Harcord Finton Modd, he fit that profile. I suppose that in todays world you would need to get Ron Jerremy to play Harry Mudd if you were making a porno spoof of Star Trek. Tolver. Ron Jeremy as Mudd in a remake? I'd actually pay to see that. They could get Ginger Lynn, Porsche Lynn and Janine to play his Women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VonHelton Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 I don't understand. Are you saying a monocultural society is preferable to a multicultural one? I think what he's trying to say is that 1% of the population shouldn't be allowed to tell us what "normal" is, or what a "marriage" is, or what is considered right or just. Further, the 99% should not have to cower in fear if they openly declare that this type of activity is PERVERSION. :stare: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcant Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 I don't understand. Are you saying a monocultural society is preferable to a multicultural one? I think what he's trying to say is that 1% of the population shouldn't be allowed to tell us what "normal" is, or what a "marriage" is, or what is considered right or just. Further, the 99% should not have to cower in fear if they openly declare that this type of activity is PERVERSION. :stare: HEAR HEAR, I'm not going to bother giving my views on this open invitation to flame thread. I will however say that over the years I have changed from a very liberal person to an increasingly angry conservative The reason? every damned minority group bouncing up and down demanding special treatment! I don't give a flying fart what sexual orientation/race/religion you are. You are entitled to the full protection of the law as a human being, you should not be entitled to extra Goverment monies, special treatment, positive discrimination, preferential job interviews Don't give me any of the usual crap avout redressing historical injustices, just get over it! I'm also totally pissed by the fact that no one these days can disagree with any of these increasingly hysterically vocal minority cliques with out being labelled Homophobic/ racist/ bigotted I hate to break it to some of you but most of us are boringly normal and by normal i mean average, thats all, just plain average. normal as in that percentage which makes up the vast majority of the population and most of us are just plain NOT INTERESTED!! do what the hell you like just don't expect rounds of applause from an appreciative audience, you wont get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piepie Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 The monocultural thing was about the alien societies having one religion, code, style of clothes, while Earth seems almost diverse as it always has. It wasn't about the gay issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vyper Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 .men who are homophobic are burying their own gay feelings Okay, while I'm not a "burn the gays" type person, I take exception to these kinds of comments. I find homosexual men repulsive. Literally. I am not judging their lifestyle or sexuality, it's just my gut reaction like tasting boiled cabbage. For this reaction alone many people would call me homophobic. I however, have no actual objection to those people living that way. People are born who they are. More importantly, I'm not burying anything - as many young ladies in the west of scotland can attest to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcant Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Or turn the arguement on its head and obviously all the heterophobic gays are just afraid to admit they secretly want to sleep with women but are afraid of being branded straight? Actually i am one of the only truely oppressed minorities left in the western world! I am not ashamed, I state it with pride! I am a SMOKER!!! Kind of back on topic. lol, Worf married a Joined trill which apart from being kind of like 3 in a bed involves 3 diffent species! the last time i looked at statutes sex with other species was called bestiality which kinda trumps homosexuality in the deviancy stakes :p so i reckon star trek has covered the issue and raised the ante lol And before anyone says I am being flippant, I will state that I am giving this thread all the serious consideration it deserves... which is kinda none Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeneralLee Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Hopefully in the "Trek Future' date='" bestiality does not exist anymore, for earthlings.[/quote'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcant Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Hopefully in the "Trek Future' date='" bestiality does not exist anymore, for earthlings.[/quote'] Spock's mother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piepie Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Oh, yeah. Is it true that in some US states smokers are treated like utter scum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcant Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 England too, i'm sick of these passive smoking leechers, if they want lung cancer they should buy their own cigerettes! Why should I have to pay for their carcinogens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
piepie Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Ah don't worry about that. We all have plenty more sources of carcinogens other than cigarettes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest c4evap Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 .men who are homophobic are burying their own gay feelings Okay, while I'm not a "burn the gays" type person, I take exception to these kinds of comments. I find homosexual men repulsive. Literally. I am not judging their lifestyle or sexuality, it's just my gut reaction like tasting boiled cabbage. For this reaction alone many people would call me homophobic. I however, have no actual objection to those people living that way. People are born who they are. More importantly, I'm not burying anything - as many young ladies in the west of scotland can attest to. OK. You say your not homophobic so the comment does not apply to you. But I'm a bit curious...why do you find homosexual men repulsive? c4 :thinking: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tolver Posted May 11, 2005 Author Share Posted May 11, 2005 Kind of back on topic. lol' date=' Worf married a Joined trill which apart from being kind of like 3 in a bed involves 3 diffent species! the last time i looked at statutes sex with other species was called bestiality which kinda trumps homosexuality in the deviancy stakes :p so i reckon star trek has covered the issue and raised the ante lol[/quote'] Well, actualy, the definition of bestiality is; http://www.answers.com/bestiality bes·ti·al·i·ty (bĕs'chē-ăl'ĭ-tē, bēs'-) n., pl. -ties. The quality or condition of being an animal or like an animal. Conduct or an action marked by depravity or brutality. Sexual relations between a human and an animal. What people are generaly refering to with that word is actualy; http://www.answers.com/zoophilia zo·o·phil·i·a (zō'ə-fĭl'ē-ə) also zo·oph·i·lism (zō-ŏf'ə-lĭz'əm) n. Affection or affinity for animals. Erotic attraction to or sexual contact with animals. Biology. A tendency to feed or grow on animal tissue. zo'o·phile' (-fīl') n. zo'o·phil'ic (zō'ə-fĭl'ĭk) adj. However, sex with another hominoid; http://www.answers.com/topic/hominoid hom·i·noid (hŏm'ə-noid') adj. Of or belonging to the superfamily Hominoidea, which includes apes and humans. Resembling a human. n. A member of the Hominoidea. is refered to as Rishathra; http://www.answers.com/topic/rishathra rishathra In Larry Niven's Ringworld novels, rishathra is sexual intercourse between individuals of two different humanoid species. It is not generally considered a taboo and is often used by the myriad hominids of the Ringworld as a way of sealing agreements, such as trade contracts and peace treaties. By extrapolation, the term has become used to mean sex between any two (or more) humanoids of different species in science fiction more generally. Basicly if you just lay there and grunt its zoophilia and if you lay there and talk about the stock market its rishathra. Tolver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenofNine Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Actually i am one of the only truely oppressed minorities left in the western world! I am not ashamed, I state it with pride! I am a SMOKER!!! Me too!!! <> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest c4evap Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Actually i am one of the only truely oppressed minorities left in the western world! I am not ashamed, I state it with pride! I am a SMOKER!!! Me too!!! <> Me three! c4 B) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevenofNine Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 Oh' date=' yeah. Is it true that in some US states smokers are treated like utter scum?[/quote'] Anti smoking has gotten out of hand, but it's not too, too terrible. Come on, now, I smoke, and I'm a college-educated scientist. I know and understand that it's bad for my health. But I also know and understand that it's bad for my children's health to be around me when I smoke. So... I smoke outside, even at home. No smoking in this house for 3 years, now. But the UK has some strict and virulent anti-smoking bias, now, too. As for here in the states, all businesses have to ban smoking in-building. The US has had the Clean Air act since 1990. Now, individual States are banning it. No smoking IN BARS in California (although ireland recently did the same thing.) I don't have any problem with a smoking ban. We'll be better off as a whole when no one smokes. In the mentime, they got me young, and I'm addicted (I have quit for as long as 3 years, before, but started again.) Smoke up, Johnny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts